Integral assays of hemostasis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 on admission and during heparin thromboprophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Blood coagulation abnormalities play a major role in COVID-19 pathophysiology. However, the specific details of hypercoagulation and anticoagulation treatment require investigation. The aim of this study was to investigate the status of the coagulation system by means of integral and local clotting assays in COVID-19 patients on admission to the hospital and in hospitalized COVID-19 patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: Thrombodynamics (TD), thromboelastography (TEG), and standard clotting assays were performed in 153 COVID-19 patients observed in a hospital setting. All patients receiving treatment, except extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients (n = 108), were administered therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) depending on body weight. The ECMO patients (n = 15) were administered unfractionated heparin (UFH). RESULTS: On admission, the patients (n = 30) had extreme hypercoagulation by all integral assays: TD showed hypercoagulation in ~75% of patients, while TEG showed hypercoagulation in ~50% of patients. The patients receiving treatment showed a significant heparin response based on TD; 77% of measurements were in the hypocoagulation range, 15% were normal, and 8% remained in hypercoagulation. TEG showed less of a response to heparin: 24% of measurements were in the hypocoagulation range, 59% were normal and 17% remained in hypercoagulation. While hypocoagulation is likely due to heparin treatment, remaining in significant hypercoagulation may indicate insufficient anticoagulation for some patients, which is in agreement with our clinical findings. There were 3 study patients with registered thrombosis episodes, and all were outside the target range for TD parameters typical for effective thromboprophylaxis (1 patient was in weak hypocoagulation, atypical for the LMWH dose used, and 2 patients remained in the hypercoagulation range despite therapeutic LMWH doses). CONCLUSION: Patients with COVID-19 have severe hypercoagulation, which persists in some patients receiving anticoagulation treatment, while significant hypocoagulation is observed in others. The data suggest critical issues of hemostasis balance in these patients and indicate the potential importance of integral assays in its control.

Longitudinal multiparametric characterization of platelet dysfunction in COVID-19: Effects of disease severity, anticoagulation therapy and inflammatory status.

INTRODUCTION: Defects of platelet functional responses in COVID-19 were reported, but their origin and pathophysiological significance are unclear. The objective of this study was to characterize the thrombocytopathy in COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of platelet functional responses to activation by flow cytometry and aggregometry in 46 patients with confirmed COVID-19 of different severity (non-ICU, ICU, and ECMO) over the course of hospitalization alongside with plasma coagulation, inflammatory markers (CRP, fibrinogen, NETosis assays in smears) was performed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All patients had increased baseline percentage of procoagulant platelets (healthy: 0.9 ± 0.5%; COVID-19: 1.7 ± 0.6%). Patients had decreased agonist-induced platelet GPIb shedding (1.8 ± 0.7 vs 1.25 ± 0.4), P-Selectin exposure (1.51 ± 0.21 vs 1.1 ± 0.3) and aggregation. The values of these parameters among the non-ICU and ICU cohorts differed modestly, while the ECMO cohort differed significantly. Only ECMO patients had pronounced thrombocytopenia. While inflammatory markers improved over time, the observed platelet functional responses changed only moderately. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found in 8% of blood samples and it did not correlate with platelet counts or responses. All patients had increased NETosis that moderately correlated with platelet dysfunction. High cumulative dosages of LMWH (average > 12,000 IU/day over 5 days) resulted in an improvement in platelet parameters. The observed pattern of platelet refractoriness was reproduced by in vitro pre-treatment of washed platelets with subnanomolar thrombin or perfusion of blood through a collagen-covered flow chamber. We conclude that platelet dysfunction in COVID-19 is consistent with the intravascular-coagulation-induced refractoriness rather than with an inflammation-induced mechanism or a direct activation by the virus.